0.00/0.02	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.04	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.10/0.37	% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
0.10/0.37	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.10/0.37	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.10/0.37	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.10/0.37	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.10/0.37	% CPULimit : 1440
0.10/0.37	% WCLimit  : 180
0.10/0.37	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 09:36:38 UTC 2026
0.10/0.37	% CPUTime  : 
0.10/0.37	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.10/0.41	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.20/0.47	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.9DVxVH2bji/E---3.1_1282483.p
0.72/0.80	% Version: 3.5.1-ho
0.72/0.80	% Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNSFA.
0.72/0.80	% Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.72/0.80	% Starting new_ho_10 with 540s (3) cores
0.72/0.80	% Starting sh2lt with 180s (1) cores
0.72/0.80	% Starting new_ho_5 with 180s (1) cores
0.72/0.80	% Starting full_lambda_5 with 180s (1) cores
0.72/0.80	% Starting sh9 with 180s (1) cores
0.72/0.80	% Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 180s (1) cores
0.72/0.80	% new_ho_10 with pid 1282496 completed with status 0
0.72/0.80	% Result found by new_ho_10
0.72/0.80	% Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNSFA.
0.72/0.80	% Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.72/0.80	% Starting new_ho_10 with 540s (3) cores
0.72/0.80	% (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
0.72/0.80	% No SInE strategy applied
0.72/0.80	% Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-MSFFFFBN
0.72/0.80	% Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 540 seconds (540 total)
0.72/0.80	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 49s (1) cores
0.72/0.80	% Starting new_ho_10 with 55s (1) cores
0.72/0.80	% Starting sh5l with 49s (1) cores
0.72/0.80	% sh5l with pid 1282508 completed with status 0
0.72/0.80	% Result found by sh5l
0.72/0.80	% Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSMSSSNSFA.
0.72/0.80	% Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.72/0.80	% Starting new_ho_10 with 540s (3) cores
0.72/0.80	% (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
0.72/0.80	% No SInE strategy applied
0.72/0.80	% Search class: HGHSM-FSLM32-MSFFFFBN
0.72/0.80	% Scheduled 7 strats onto 3 cores with 540 seconds (540 total)
0.72/0.80	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 49s (1) cores
0.72/0.80	% Starting new_ho_10 with 55s (1) cores
0.72/0.80	% Starting sh5l with 49s (1) cores
0.72/0.80	% Preprocessing time       : 0.015 s
0.72/0.80	% Presaturation interreduction done
0.72/0.80	
0.72/0.80	% Proof found!
0.72/0.80	% SZS status Theorem
0.72/0.80	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.72/0.80	thf(decl_sort1, type, pi: $tType).
0.72/0.80	thf(decl_sort2, type, name: $tType).
0.72/0.80	thf(decl_sort3, type, late_freeRes: $tType).
0.72/0.80	thf(decl_sort4, type, late_residual: $tType).
0.72/0.80	thf(decl_25, type, par: pi > pi > pi).
0.72/0.80	thf(decl_27, type, res: name > pi > pi).
0.72/0.80	thf(decl_35, type, late_FreeR: late_freeRes > pi > late_residual).
0.72/0.80	thf(decl_38, type, late_transitions: pi > late_residual > $o).
0.72/0.80	thf(decl_49, type, fresh_1641682979reeRes: name > late_freeRes > $o).
0.72/0.80	thf(decl_102, type, p: pi).
0.72/0.80	thf(decl_103, type, p2: pi).
0.72/0.80	thf(decl_105, type, q: pi).
0.72/0.80	thf(decl_107, type, alpha: late_freeRes).
0.72/0.80	thf(decl_108, type, x: name).
0.72/0.80	thf(conj_0, conjecture, (late_transitions @ (res @ x @ (par @ p @ q)) @ (late_FreeR @ alpha @ (res @ x @ (par @ p2 @ q)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.9DVxVH2bji/E---3.1_1282483.p', conj_0)).
0.72/0.80	thf(fact_11_ResF, axiom, ![X65:pi, X63:late_freeRes, X16:pi, X66:name]:((((late_transitions @ (res @ X66 @ X65) @ (late_FreeR @ X63 @ (res @ X66 @ X16)))<=(fresh_1641682979reeRes @ X66 @ X63))<=(late_transitions @ X65 @ (late_FreeR @ X63 @ X16)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.9DVxVH2bji/E---3.1_1282483.p', fact_11_ResF)).
0.72/0.80	thf(fact_0__092_060open_062x_A_092_060sharp_062_A_092_060alpha_062_092_060close_062, axiom, (fresh_1641682979reeRes @ x @ alpha), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.9DVxVH2bji/E---3.1_1282483.p', fact_0__092_060open_062x_A_092_060sharp_062_A_092_060alpha_062_092_060close_062)).
0.72/0.80	thf(fact_1__092_060open_062P_A_092_060parallel_062_AQ_A_092_060longmapsto_062_A_092_060alpha_062_A_092_060prec_062_AP_H_A_092_060parallel_062_AQ_092_060close_062, axiom, (late_transitions @ (par @ p @ q) @ (late_FreeR @ alpha @ (par @ p2 @ q))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.9DVxVH2bji/E---3.1_1282483.p', fact_1__092_060open_062P_A_092_060parallel_062_AQ_A_092_060longmapsto_062_A_092_060alpha_062_A_092_060prec_062_AP_H_A_092_060parallel_062_AQ_092_060close_062)).
0.72/0.80	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ~((late_transitions @ (res @ x @ (par @ p @ q)) @ (late_FreeR @ alpha @ (res @ x @ (par @ p2 @ q))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])).
0.72/0.80	thf(c_0_5, plain, ![X65:pi, X63:late_freeRes, X16:pi, X66:name]:(((late_transitions @ X65 @ (late_FreeR @ X63 @ X16))=>((fresh_1641682979reeRes @ X66 @ X63)=>(late_transitions @ (res @ X66 @ X65) @ (late_FreeR @ X63 @ (res @ X66 @ X16)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_11_ResF])).
0.72/0.80	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ~(late_transitions @ (res @ x @ (par @ p @ q)) @ (late_FreeR @ alpha @ (res @ x @ (par @ p2 @ q)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.72/0.80	thf(c_0_7, plain, ![X2052:pi, X2053:late_freeRes, X2054:pi, X2055:name]:((~(late_transitions @ X2052 @ (late_FreeR @ X2053 @ X2054))|(~(fresh_1641682979reeRes @ X2055 @ X2053)|(late_transitions @ (res @ X2055 @ X2052) @ (late_FreeR @ X2053 @ (res @ X2055 @ X2054)))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])).
0.72/0.80	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ~(late_transitions @ (res @ x @ (par @ p @ q)) @ (late_FreeR @ alpha @ (res @ x @ (par @ p2 @ q)))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.72/0.80	thf(c_0_9, plain, ![X6:pi, X2:name, X15:pi, X8:late_freeRes]:(((late_transitions @ (res @ X2 @ X6) @ (late_FreeR @ X8 @ (res @ X2 @ X15)))|~((late_transitions @ X6 @ (late_FreeR @ X8 @ X15)))|~((fresh_1641682979reeRes @ X2 @ X8)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.72/0.80	thf(c_0_10, plain, (fresh_1641682979reeRes @ x @ alpha), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_0__092_060open_062x_A_092_060sharp_062_A_092_060alpha_062_092_060close_062])).
0.72/0.80	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ~((late_transitions @ (res @ x @ (par @ p @ q)) @ (late_FreeR @ alpha @ (res @ x @ (par @ p2 @ q))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.72/0.80	thf(c_0_12, plain, ![X6:pi, X15:pi]:(((late_transitions @ (res @ x @ X6) @ (late_FreeR @ alpha @ (res @ x @ X15)))|~((late_transitions @ X6 @ (late_FreeR @ alpha @ X15))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10])).
0.72/0.80	thf(c_0_13, plain, (late_transitions @ (par @ p @ q) @ (late_FreeR @ alpha @ (par @ p2 @ q))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_1__092_060open_062P_A_092_060parallel_062_AQ_A_092_060longmapsto_062_A_092_060alpha_062_A_092_060prec_062_AP_H_A_092_060parallel_062_AQ_092_060close_062])).
0.72/0.80	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12]), c_0_13])]), ['proof']).
0.72/0.80	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.72/0.80	% Parsed axioms                        : 434
0.72/0.80	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.72/0.80	% Initial clauses                      : 1034
0.72/0.80	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 146
0.72/0.80	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 888
0.72/0.80	% Processed clauses                    : 2026
0.72/0.80	% ...of these trivial                  : 38
0.72/0.80	% ...subsumed                          : 463
0.72/0.80	% ...remaining for further processing  : 1525
0.72/0.80	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 134
0.72/0.80	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.72/0.80	% Backward-subsumed                    : 15
0.72/0.80	% Backward-rewritten                   : 29
0.72/0.80	% Generated clauses                    : 2216
0.72/0.80	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1834
0.72/0.80	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.72/0.80	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.72/0.80	% Paramodulations                      : 1897
0.72/0.80	% Factorizations                       : 2
0.72/0.80	% NegExts                              : 11
0.72/0.80	% Equation resolutions                 : 174
0.72/0.80	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.72/0.80	% Total rewrite steps                  : 363
0.72/0.80	% ...of those cached                   : 197
0.72/0.80	% Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.72/0.80	%    Propositional check models        : 0
0.72/0.80	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.72/0.80	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.72/0.80	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.72/0.80	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.72/0.80	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.72/0.80	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.72/0.80	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.72/0.80	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.72/0.80	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.72/0.80	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.72/0.80	% Current number of processed clauses  : 647
0.72/0.80	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 150
0.72/0.80	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 8
0.72/0.80	%    Negative unit clauses             : 114
0.72/0.80	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 375
0.72/0.80	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1357
0.72/0.80	% ...number of literals in the above   : 4063
0.72/0.80	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.72/0.80	% Current number of archived clauses   : 848
0.72/0.80	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 260935
0.72/0.80	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 85735
0.72/0.80	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 164
0.72/0.80	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6819
0.72/0.80	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 675
0.72/0.80	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 4455
0.72/0.80	% BW rewrite match successes           : 122
0.72/0.80	% Condensation attempts                : 2026
0.72/0.80	% Condensation successes               : 7
0.72/0.80	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 183215
0.72/0.80	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 18501
0.72/0.80	
0.72/0.80	% -------------------------------------------------
0.72/0.80	% User time                : 0.256 s
0.72/0.80	% System time              : 0.016 s
0.72/0.80	% Total time               : 0.272 s
0.72/0.80	% Maximum resident set size: 8252 pages
0.72/0.80	
0.72/0.80	% -------------------------------------------------
0.72/0.80	% User time                : 0.539 s
0.72/0.80	% System time              : 0.040 s
0.72/0.80	% Total time               : 0.578 s
0.72/0.80	% Maximum resident set size: 5888 pages
0.72/0.80	% E exiting
2.18/0.80	EOF